Preview

Pacific Medical Journal

Advanced search

Experience and efficiency of outreach diagnostics for glaucoma patients in Komsomolsk-on-Amur

https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2022-4-99-103

Abstract

The efficiency of outreach diagnostics was assessed in 273 patients suffering from various forms glaucoma aged from 27 to 80 years. Following the developed algorithm, a set of instrumental and diagnostic tests was carried out to select 153 patients for surgical treatment and 64 patients for laser treatment. Necessary adjustments were made to the regimens of antihypertensive treatment for most patients, and recommendations were given. All glaucoma patients selected for surgical and laser treatment received timely and qualified assistance from specialists of the Khabarovsk branch of S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, which allowed the course of the disease to be stabilized and visual functions to be preserved. As a result, outreach consultations for patients with various forms of glaucoma showed their high efficiency. More than 60% of the examined patients were referred for surgical and laser treatment, 20% of patients were offered a corrected hypotensive regimen. Along with examining patients, outreach consultations provide methodological assistance for local ophthalmologists concerning the development of professional competencies in managing such patients. Due to a lack of ophthalmological services in regional polyclinical departments, the organization of outreach consultations for glaucoma patients is justified in terms of reducing cases of glaucoma progression and loss of visual functions.

About the Authors

A. N. Marchenko
S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, the Khabarovsk Branch
Russian Federation

Alexey N. Marchenko, PhD, Head of the Glaucoma Department, Ophthalmologist 

211, Tikhookeanskaya str., Khabarovsk, 680033



N. V. Samokhvalov
S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, the Khabarovsk Branch
Russian Federation

Khabarovsk



Т. G. Gasendych
S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, the Khabarovsk Branch
Russian Federation

Khabarovsk



S. Yu. Vysotskaya
S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, the Khabarovsk Branch
Russian Federation

Khabarovsk



E. A. Stepanova
Sentiss Rus
Russian Federation

Khabarovsk



References

1. Listopadova NA, Sergeeva ES. To question on the state of long-term passive and active medical examination in primary open-angle glaucoma. Health Manager. 2008;(9):47‒50 (In Russ.)]

2. Bikbov MM, Babushkin AE, Murova LH, Matyukhina EN. Epidemiological aspects of glaucoma and the state of patient medical examination in the Republic of Bashkortostan. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2017;(2):12‒5 (In Russ.)]

3. Egorov VV, Badogina SP. State and problems of rehabilitation of glaucoma patients in Priamuriye. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2003;4(1):20−3 (In Russ.)]

4. Egorov VV, Badogina SP, Marchenko AN. The role of Khabarovsk branch of Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution in early identification and rehabilitation of glaucoma patients in Priamuriye. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2003;(4):38−41 (In Russ.)]

5. Egorov VV, Marchenko AN, Postupaev AV. Dispensary supervision of patients with glaucoma in out-patient and polyclinic centers. Public health of the Far East. 2014;(2):37−40 (In Russ.)]

6. Egorov VV, Sorokin EL. Glaucoma in Khabarovsk Krai. Unresolved problems and prospects. Public health of the Far East. 2002;(1):13−7 (In Russ.)]

7. Erichev VP, Abdullaeva EH, Mazurova UV. Frequency and nature of intraoperative and early postoperative complications after glaucoma surgeries. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2021;137(1):54‒9 (In Russ.)] doi: 10.17116/oftalma202113701154

8. Kurysheva NI. Providing eye care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2021;137(3):106‒14 (In Russ.)] doi: 10.17116/oftalma2021137031106

9. Egorov EA, editor. National Guidelines on Glaucoma. Moscow; 2019 (In Russ.)]

10. Dogadova LP, Melnikov VY, Abdullin EA. Epidemiology of glaucoma in Primorskiy Krai. Pacific Medical Journal. 2018;(3):97‒8 (In Russ.)] doi: 10.17238/PmJ1609-1175.2018.3.97-98

11. Malyugin BE, Muraviev SV. Results of canaloplasty in glaucoma surgery. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2014;(2):81‒4 (In Russ.)]

12. Sorokin EL, Marchenko AN. Study of morphometric causes of an emergence and progression of a primary angle-closure glaucoma. Сlinical Ophthalmology. 2013;13(4):160‒3 (In Russ.)]

13. Yashina VN, Sokolovskaya TV. Innovative technologies in combined surgery of glaucoma and complicated cataract. National Journal glaucoma. 2019;18(1):73‒84 (In Russ.)] doi: 10.25700/NJG.2019.01.09

14. Sorokin EL, Egorov VV, Kolenko OV, Zhirov AL, Bushnina LV. Research of frequency and structure of degenerative myopia among patients with myopia refraction. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2013;10(1):14‒7 (In Russ.)] doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2013-1-14-17

15. Kolenko OV, Sorokin EL. Delivery in pregnant women with myopia, the choice of tactics. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2016;(3):64‒8 (In Russ.)] doi: 10.25276/0235-4160-2016-3-64-68


Review

For citations:


Marchenko A.N., Samokhvalov N.V., Gasendych Т.G., Vysotskaya S.Yu., Stepanova E.A. Experience and efficiency of outreach diagnostics for glaucoma patients in Komsomolsk-on-Amur. Pacific Medical Journal. 2022;(4):99-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2022-4-99-103

Views: 257


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1609-1175 (Print)