Preview

Pacific Medical Journal

Advanced search

The present and future of forensic genetics

https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2023-4-42-46

Abstract

In this article, we discuss the current state and future directions in the field of forensic genetics. The DNA analysis of biological traces found at a crime scene, which was first used in a criminal investigation in 1987, did revolutionize forensic science. Over the past three decades, significant advances have been made in the recognition capacity, speed, and sensitivity of DNA profiling methods, as well as in their capability of typing increasingly complex patterns. Creation of DNA databases of criminals and crime scenes, as well as population allele frequencies, allows suspects to be identified from crime scene samples and DNA evidence to be statistically processed to verify its reliability. At present, it has become possible to identify even single cells left at a crime scene and to successfully analyze ancient human remains. Forensic DNA profiling can be used to identify not only individuals known to the investigating authorities. Experts are increasingly applying new genetic markers that can expand the scope of DNA profiling methods. Modern developments enable extraction of new types of forensically significant information from biological traces, e.g., using molecular approaches to searching for individuals previously unknown to investigators. New methods have been proposed to identify the relationship between the donors of forensic samples and the crimes committed. Modern advances in the decoding of the human genome, as well as the availability of genome-wide analysis and sequencing techniques, pave the way for new forensic DNA tools capable of enhancing the quality of forensic science in the near future.

About the Authors

T. A. Fominykh
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Tatyana A. Fominykh, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of Department of Forensic Medicine, Institute «Medical Academy named aft er S.I. Georgievsky»

5/7 Lenina Boulevard, Simferopol 295051



V. S. Ulanov
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Simferopol



A. N. Zakharova
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Simferopol



V. V. Kiselev
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Simferopol



References

1. Haddrill PR. Developments in forensic DNA analysis. Emerging topics in life sciences. 2021;5(3):381–93. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20200304

2. Giardina E, Ragazzo M. Special issue «Forensic Genetics and Genomics». Genes (Basel). 2021;12(2):158. doi: 10.3390/genes12020158

3. Giardina E, Spinella A, Novelli G. Past, present and future of forensic DNA typing. Nanomedicine (London). 2011;6(2):257–70. doi: 10.2217/nnm.10.160

4. Morling N. Forensic genetics. Lancet. 2004;364(1):10–1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17621-6

5. Mishra A, Sathyan S, Shukla SK. Application of DNA Fingerprinting in an alleged case of paternity. Biochemistry and Analytical Biochemistry. 2015;4(2):165. doi: 10.4172/2161-1009.1000165

6. Ungria MC. Forensic DNA analysis in criminal investigations. The Philippine journal of science. 2003;132: 13–9.

7. Dumache R, Ciocan V, Muresan C, Enache A. Molecular genetics and its applications in forensic sciences. In: Shetty BSK, Padubidri JR, editors. Forensic Analysis– From Death to Justice. InTechOpen; 2016. P. 87–96. doi: 10.5772/63530

8. LiC. Forensic genetics. Forensic Sciences Research. 2018;3(2):103–4. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2018.1489445

9. ByardRW, JamesH, BerketaJ, HeathK. Locard`s principle of exchange, dental examination and fragments of skin. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2016;61(2):545–7. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12964

10. Reich DE, Schaffner SF, Daly MJ, McVean G, Mullikin JC, HigginsJM, RichterDJ, LanderES, AltshulerD. Human genome sequence variation and the influence of gene history, mutation and recombination. Nature Genetics. 2002;32(1):135–42. doi: 10.1038/ng947

11. Jobling MA. Forensic genetics through the lens of Lewontin: population structure, ancestry and race. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2022;377(1852):20200422. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0422

12. RoewerL. DNA fingerprinting in forensics: past, present, future. Investigative Genetics. 2013;4(1):22. doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-4-22

13. Gill P. DNA as evidence – the technology of identification. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352(26):2669–71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048359

14. MaranoLA, FridmanC. DNA phenotyping: current application in forensic science. Research and Reports in Forensic Medical Science. 2019;9:1–8. doi: 10.2147/RRFMS.S164090

15. MartinPD, SchmitterH, SchneiderPM. A brief history of the formation of DNA databases in forensic science within Europe. Forensic Science International. 2001;119(2):225–31. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00436-9

16. Raina A, Dogra TD. Application of DNA fingerprinting in medicolegal practice. Journal of Indian Medical Association. 2002;100(12):688–94.

17. Kayser M, de Knijff P. Improving human forensics through advances in genetics, genomics and molecular biology. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2011;12:179–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2952

18. ButlerJM. Forensic DNA testing. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2011;2011(12):1438–50. doi: 10.1101/pdb.top066928

19. Kayser M. Forensic DNA phenotyping: predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2015;18:33–48. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.02.003

20. SchneiderPM, PrainsackB, KayserM. The use of forensic DNA phenotyping in predicting appearance and biogeographic ancestry. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2019;116(51-52):873–80. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0873

21. BirdA. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature. 2007;447:396–98. doi: 10.1038/nature05913

22. Ohgane J, Yagi S, Shiota K. Epigenetics: the DNA methylation profile of tissue-dependent and differentially methylated regions in cells. Placenta. 2008;22:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2007.09.011

23. VidakiA, KayserM. Recent progress, methods and perspectives in forensic epigenetics. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2018;37:180–95. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.008

24. Phillips C. The Golden State Killer investigation and the nascent field of forensic genealogy. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2018;36:186–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.010

25. Mateen RM, Sabar MF, Hussain S, Parveen R, Hussain M. Familial DNA analysis and criminal investigation: Usage, downsides and privacy concerns. Forensic Science International. 2021;318:110576. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110576

26. deKnijff P. On the forensic use of Y-chromosome polymorphisms. Genes (Basel). 2022;13(5):898. doi: 10.3390/genes13050898

27. KayserM. Forensic use of Y-chromosome DNA: a general overview. Human Genetics. 2017 May;136(5):621–35. doi: 10.1007/s00439-017-1776-9


Review

For citations:


Fominykh T.A., Ulanov V.S., Zakharova A.N., Kiselev V.V. The present and future of forensic genetics. Pacific Medical Journal. 2023;(4):42-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2023-4-42-46

Views: 892


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1609-1175 (Print)