Features of patient adaptation during orthopedic rehabilitation based on an assessment of the quality of life and the degree of fixation of removable plate prostheses
https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2020-2-25-28
Abstract
About the Authors
V. A. ChesnokovRussian Federation
Vladislav A. Chesnokov, MD
8 Pereleta St., Omsk, 644023
V. V. Zherebtsov
Russian Federation
Omsk
References
1. Arutyunyan MR, Konnov VV. Comparative analysis of clinical and functional adaptation to partial dentures based on nylon and acrylic plastic. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2015;3:147–50 (in Russ).
2. Trunin DA, Tlustenko VP, Sadykov MI. Results of orthopedic treatment of patients with complete and partial absence of teeth. Russian Dental Journal. 2017;21(5):266–70 (in Russ).
3. Joshi P. Prosthetic rehabilitation in a partially edentulous patient with lost vertical dimension: Сlinical report. Nepal J Med Sci. 2013;2(1):77–80.
4. Iroshnikova ES, Timofeeva-Kol’cova TP. The effect of violation of the terms of adaptation to dentures on the occurrence of conflict situations between the patient and the doctor. XVII International Conference of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons and Dentists. Moscow; 2013:79–80 (in Russ).
5. Zholudev SE. Features of prosthetics with full removable prostheses and adaptation to them in elderly people. Ural Medical Journal. 2012;8(10):31–5 (In Russ).
6. Zholudev SE, Gette SA. The solution to the problem of adaptation to removable dentures with complete loss of teeth (clinical case). Dental problems. 2016;12(3):46–51 (in Russ).
7. Ilyuhina MO, Bizyaev AA, Konnov VV, Maslennikov DN, Proshin AG. Hygienic status of patients using dentures with acrylic and titanium bases. Bulletin of Online Medical Conferences. 2012;2(11):932–33 (in Russ).
8. Naito M, Yuasa H, Nomura Y, Nakayama Т, Hamajima N, Hanada N. Oral health status and health-related quality of life: A systematic review. J Oral Sci. 2006;48(1):1–7.
9. Arutyunyan MR, Konnov VV. The results of determining the fixation index of a removable Ulitovsky–Leontiev prosthesis in patients with acrylic and nylon prostheses. Modern innovations: Theory and practice of the development of modern scientific knowledge: VI International scientificpractical conference. Moscow; 2016;10(12):38–40 (in Russ).
10. Bersanov RU, Olesova VN, Novozemceva TN, Shmakov NA, Yuffa EP, Lesnyak AV. Subjective satisfaction with prosthetics and the objective quality of dentures, depending on the timing of their use. Russian Dental Journal. 2015;4:52–4 (in Russ).
11. Ryzhova IP, Prisnyj AA, Salivonchik MS. Study of the mutual influence of dental prosthesis designs and oral microbiocinosis. Saratovskij NauchnoMedicinskij Zhurnal. 2013;9(3):459–62 (in Russ).
12. Chesnokova MG, Chesnokov VA, Musienko AI, Nesterova KI. Assessment of the hygienic condition of the oral cavity in people with excess body mass index at the stages of orthopedic rehabilitation with removable dentures. Periodontology. 2019;24(3):269–73 (in Russ).
13. Sadykov MI, Trunin DA, Nesterov AM, Chistyakova MS. Immunological and microbiological status of the oral cavity in elderly patients using removable plate prostheses. Science and Innovations in Medicine. 2016;2(2):50–4 (in Russ).
14. ЧChesnokov VA, Chesnokova MG. Mycobiota of the oral mucosa and the surface of removable acrylic plate prostheses during orthopedic rehabilitation. Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics. 2016;61(2):126–8 (in Russ).
15. Naito M, Nakayama Т, Fukuhara S. Quality of life assessment and reporting in randomized controlled trials: a study of literature published from Japan. Health Quality Life Outcomes. 2004;2:31. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-31
Review
For citations:
Chesnokov V.A., Zherebtsov V.V. Features of patient adaptation during orthopedic rehabilitation based on an assessment of the quality of life and the degree of fixation of removable plate prostheses. Pacific Medical Journal. 2020;(2):25-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2020-2-25-28