Comparative characteristics of pachymetry methods of anterior segment of eye
Abstract
About the Authors
M. E. NerpinaRussian Federation
M. D. Pozaritskiy
Russian Federation
References
1. Bechmann M., Thiel M.J., Roesen B. [et al.] Central corneal thickness measurement with a retinal optical coherence tomography device versus standart ultrasonic pachymetry // Cornea. 2001. Vol. 20. P. 50-54.
2. Chen S., Huang J., Wen D. [et al.] Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry // Acta Ophthalmol. 2012. Vol. 90, No. 5. P. 449-455.
3. Giasson C., Forthomme D. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements between optical and ultrasound pachymeters // Optom. Vis. Sci. 1992. Vol. 69, P. 236-241.
4. Krachmer J.H., Mark J.M., Edward J.H. Corneа. Elsevier, 2011. 2080 p.
5. Marsich M.M., Bullimore M.A. The repeatability of corneal thickness measures // Cornea. 2000. Vol. 19. P. 792-795.
6. Reinstein D.Z., Silverman R.H., Trokel S.L., Coleman D.J. Corneal pachymetric topography // Ophthalmology. 1994. Vol. 101. P. 432-438.
7. Rainer G., Findl O., Petternel V. Central corneal thickness measurement with partial coherence interferometry, ultrasound, and the Orbscan system // Ophthalmology. 2004. Vol. 111. P. 875-879.
8. Tam E.S., Rootman D.S. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by specular microscopy, ultrasound pachymetry, and ultrasound biomicroscopy // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2003. Vol. 29, No. 6. P. 1179-1184.
9. Wilson R. Corneal pachymetric mapping in normal eyes // Approach. Ophthalmol. 1999. Vol. 11. P. 733-758.
Review
For citations:
Nerpina M.E., Pozaritskiy M.D. Comparative characteristics of pachymetry methods of anterior segment of eye. Pacific Medical Journal. 2014;(4):76-77. (In Russ.)