Retrograde cholangiopancreatography: experience of 868 surgeries
Abstract
About the Authors
E. F. RyizhkovRussian Federation
A. S. Barsukov
Russian Federation
M. Yu. Agapov
Russian Federation
E. D. Demicheva
Russian Federation
References
1. Борисов А.Е., Земляной В.П., Непомнящая С.Л. и др. Малоинвазивные технологии в лечении желчно-каменной болезни, осложненной поражением внепеченочных желчных путей и большого сосочка двенадцатиперстной кишки // Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2004. Т. 9, № 2. С. 22-30.
2. Arata S., Nakada T., Hirata K. et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis // Journal of Hepato-billiary-pancreatic Sciences. 2010. Vol. 1. P. 70-78.
3. Cennamo V., Fuccio L., Zagari R.M. et al. Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials // Endoscopy. 2010. Vol. 5. P. 381-388.
4. Cotton P.B., Leung J.W. Advanced Digestive Endoscopy: ERCP. USA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2005. 432 p.
5. Dumonceau J. -M., Andriulli A., Deviere J. et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline: Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis // Endoscopy. 2010. Vol. 6. P. 503-515.
6. Laasch H.U., Tringali A., Wilbraham L. et al. Comparison of standard and steerable catheters for bile duct cannulation in ERCP // Endoscopy. 2003. Vol. 8. P. 669-674.
7. Lee T.H., Park do H., Park J.Y. et al. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial // Gastrointeatinal Endoscopy. 2009. Vol. 3. P. 444-449.
8. Testony P.A. Why the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis varies considerably? Factors affecting the diagnosis and the incidence of this complication // Journal of Pancreas. 2002. Vol. 6. P. 195-201.
Review
For citations:
Ryizhkov E.F., Barsukov A.S., Agapov M.Yu., Demicheva E.D. Retrograde cholangiopancreatography: experience of 868 surgeries. Pacific Medical Journal. 2011;(4):83-85. (In Russ.)