Modern methods of surgical treatment for female genital prolapse with synthetic mesh prosthesis
Abstract
The authors present review of foreign literature devoted to the comparative analysis of the methods of treating female genital prolapses and impart results of randomized multicenter clinical trials aimed to estimate efficiency of applying the Perigee, Apogee, Avaulta, Pinnacle, Uphold, Elevate and Prolift implants. Analyzing the incidence rate and the structure of early and late post-surgery complications allows to come to a conclusion that both traditional methods of surgical correction for the genital prolapses and methods of surgical treatment with the synthetic mesh prosthesis and impants made of biomaterials exhibit comparable efficiency.
About the Authors
V. V. Diakov
Moscow State Medical Stomatological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. A. Malkhasyan
Moscow State Medical Stomatological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Abdel-Fattah M. Ramsay I. West of Scotland Study Group. Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse // BJOG. 2008. Vol. 115, No. 1. P. 22-30.
2. Al-Nazer M.A. IWGI. Comparative study between anterior colporrhaphy versus vaginal wall repair with mesh for management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse // Int. Urogynecol. J. 2007. Vol. 18, Suppl. 1. P. S49-S50.
3. Aungst M.J., Friedman E.B., Von Pechmann W.S. et al. De novo stress incontinence and pelvic muscle symptoms after transvaginal mesh repair// Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009. Vol. 201, No. 1. P. 73-77.
4. Baessler K., Hewson A.D., Tunn R. et al. Severe mesh complications following intravaginal slingplasty // Obstet. Gynecol. 2005. Vol. 106, No. 4. P. 713-716.
5. Borstad E., Abdelnoor M., Staff A.C., Kulseng-Hanssen S. Surgical strategies for women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010. Vol. 21, No. 2. P. 179-186.
6. Carey M., Higgs P., Goh J. et al. Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial // BJOG. 2009. Vol. 116, No. 10. P. 1380-1386.
7. Cosson M., Caquant F., Collinet P. et al. Prolift mesh (Gynecare) for pelvic organ prolapse surgical treatment using the TVM group: a retrospective study of 687 patients. Communication in the ICS meeting Montreal 31 August 2005.
8. De Ridder D. Should we use meshes in the management of vaginal prolapse? // Curr. Opin. Urol. 2008. Vol. 18. P. 377-382.
9. Diez-Itza I., Aizpitarte I., Becerro A., Sarasqueta C. Incidence of overactive bladder after vaginal hysterectomy and associated repairs for pelvic organ prolapse // Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2009. Vol. 68, No. 1. P. 65-70.
10. Farnsworth B.N. Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) for severe posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse - a preliminary report on efficacy and safety // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002. Vol. 13, No. 1. P. 4-8.
11. Foon R., Toozs-Hobson P., Latthe P.M. Adjuvant materials in anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008. Vol. 19. P. 1697-1706.
12. Gandhi S., Goldberg R.P., Kwon C. et al. A prospective randomized trial using solvent dehydrated fascia lata for the prevention of recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005. Vol. 192. P. 1649-1654.
13. Gauruder-Burmester A., Koutouzidou P., Rohne J. et al. Follow-up after polypropylene mesh repair of anterior and posterior compartments in patients with recurrent prolapse // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007. Vol. 18, No. 9. P. 1059-1064.
14. Glazener C.M.A., Adams E.J. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. C. Maher, K. Baessler, S.H. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4, 2009 (Status in this issue: Unchanged) // BJOG. 2009. Vol. 116, No. 10. P. 1380-1386.
15. Hiltunen R., Nieminen K., Takala T. et al. Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial // Obstet. Gynecol. 2007. Vol. 110. P. 455-462.
16. Hviid U.H. A randomised controlled study of biomesh (Pelvicol) for vaginal anterior wall prolapse // Int. Urogynecol. J. 2005. Vol. 16. P. S58.
17. Julian T.M. The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of sever, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996. Vol. 175, No. 6. P. 1472-1475.
18. Lowman J.K., Jones L.A., Woodman P.J., Hale D.S. Does the Prolift system cause dyspareunia?// Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008. Vol. 199, No. 6. P. 707.
19. Luck A.M., Steele A.C., Leong F.C., McLennan M.T. Short-term efficacy and complications of posterior intravaginal slingplasty // Int. J. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008. Vol. 19, No. 6. P. 795-799.
20. Meschia M., Pifarotti P., Bernasconi F. et al. Porcine skin collagen implants to prevent anterior vaginal wall prolapse recurrence: a multicenter, randomized study // J. Urol. 2007. Vol. 177. P. 192-195.
21. Morley G.W., DeLancey J.O. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for eversion of the vagina // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1988. Vol. 158, No. 4. P. 872-881.
22. Natale F., La P.C., Padoa A. et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing Gynemesh, a synthetic mesh, and Pelvicol, a biologic graft, in the surgical treatment of recurrent cystocele // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009. Vol. 20. P. 75-81.
23. Nguyen J.N., Burchette R.J. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial // Obstet. Gynecol. 2008. Vol. 111, No. 4. P. 891-898.
24. Novara G., Galfano A., Mancini M. et al. Critical assessment of pelvic floor surgical reconstruction outcome // EAU-EBU Update Series. 2006. Vol. 4. P. 202-213.
25. Nygaard I. What does “FDA-approved” mean for medical devices? // Obstet. Gynecol. 2008. Vol. 111, No. 1. P. 4-6.
26. Paraiso M.F., Barber M.D., Muir T.W., Walters M.D. Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006. Vol. 195. P. 1762-1771.
27. Reisenauer C., Kirschniak A., Drews U., Wallwiener D. Anatomical conditions for pelvic floor reconstruction with polypropylene implant and its applicatior for the treatment of vaginal prolapse // Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2007. Vol. 131, No. 2. P. 214-225.
28. Sand P.K., Koduri S., Lobel R. W. et al. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles //Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001. Vol. 184, No. 7. P. 1357-1362.
29. Valentim-Lourenco A., Henriques A., Ribeirinho A.L. et al. Outcome (POP-Q) of pelvic organ prolapse with Prolift1 prosthesis vs collagen prosthesis (Pelvicol1) vs classical anterior and/or posterior colporaphy: prospective study // ICS meeting, Christchurch. 2006. Abstract 442.
30. Weber A.M., Walters M.D., Piedmonte M.R., Ballard L.A. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001. Vol. 185, No. 6. P. 1299-1304.
Review
For citations:
Diakov V.V., Malkhasyan V.A. Modern methods of surgical treatment for female genital prolapse with synthetic mesh prosthesis. Pacific Medical Journal. 2011;(1):14-19. (In Russ.)
Views:
223
Email this article 