Epidemiology of Hantavirus and epizootic process in Apodemus genus mice populations
Abstract
The authors provide data concerning epidemiologic
and epizootic manifestations of Hantavirus infection within the
Primorsky Krai territory being enzootic for the pathogenous
Hunt viruses Hantaan and Amur. Observations of the population
number and contamination rate of Apodemus genus mice that
are reservoir animals of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome
pathogens allow to identify indicators of epizooty activity level
that influences the epidemiological process. There is a tie between
annual and seasonal dynamics of the morbidity rate and the dynamics
of a number of field and Korean field mice infected with
Hantavirus with acute infection that are a source of human infection
in natural nidi of hantavirus infection caused by various
pathogen types.
and epizootic manifestations of Hantavirus infection within the
Primorsky Krai territory being enzootic for the pathogenous
Hunt viruses Hantaan and Amur. Observations of the population
number and contamination rate of Apodemus genus mice that
are reservoir animals of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome
pathogens allow to identify indicators of epizooty activity level
that influences the epidemiological process. There is a tie between
annual and seasonal dynamics of the morbidity rate and the dynamics
of a number of field and Korean field mice infected with
Hantavirus with acute infection that are a source of human infection
in natural nidi of hantavirus infection caused by various
pathogen types.
Keywords
616.61-002.151:[616.98:578.833.29]-036.22(1-525)
About the Authors
Р. Слонова
НИИ эпидемиологии и микробиологии СО РАМН
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Т. Кушнарева
НИИ эпидемиологии и микробиологии СО РАМН
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Г. Компанец
НИИ эпидемиологии и микробиологии СО РАМН
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
И. Максема
НИИ эпидемиологии и микробиологии СО РАМН
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
О. Иунихина
НИИ эпидемиологии и микробиологии СО РАМН
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Е. Кушнарев
НИИ эпидемиологии и микробиологии СО РАМН
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
R. A. Slonova
Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, SB RAMS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
T. V. Kushnareva
Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, SB RAMS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
G. G. Kompanets
Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, SB RAMS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. G. Maksema
Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, SB RAMS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. V. Iunikhina
Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, SB RAMS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. L. Kushnarev
Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, SB RAMS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Иванов Л.И., Здановская Н.И, Волков В.И. и др. Особенности циркуляции хантавирусов в эпидемиологии ГЛПС в российском Приамурье // Актуальные проблемы медицинской вирусологии: материалы Всероссийской конференции. М, 1999. С. 66.
2. Кушнарева Т.В. Эпизоотический потенциал мышевидных грызунов в природных очагах хантавирусной инфекции и его эпидемиологическое значение // Тихоокеанский мед. журн. 2008. № 2. С. 50-52.
3. Методы лабораторной диагностики геморрагической лихорадки с почечным синдромом. М.: МЗ СССР, 1982. 22 c.
4. Нургалиева Р.Г., Ткаченко Е.А., Степаненко А.Г. Эпидемиологический анализ заболеваемости ГЛПС в Республике Башкортостан в 1997 году // Журн. микробиол. 1999. № 6. С. 45-49.
5. Слонова Р.А., Кушнарева Т.В., Компанец Г.Г. и др. Хантавирусная инфекция в Приморском крае // Журн. микробиол. 2006. № 3, прил. С. 74-77.
6. Avsic-Zupanc T. Hantaviruses and hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in Balkans // Factors in the emergence and control of rodent-born viral diseases. Paris, 1999. P. 93-98.
7. Bernshtein A.D., Apekina N.S., Mikhailova T.V. et al. Dynamics of Puumala hantavirus nfection in naturally infected bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) // Arch Virol. 1999. Vol. 44, issue 12. P. 2415-2428.
8. Easterbrook J.D., Klein S.L. Immunological mechanisms mediating hantavirus persistence in rodent reservoirs // PLos pathogens. 2008. Vol. 4, issue 11. P. 1-8.
9. Hedman K., Vahery A., Brummer-Korvenkontio M. Rapid diagnosis of hantavirus disease with IgG-avidity assay // Lancet. 1991. Vol. 338. P. 1313-1356.
10. Hutchinson K.L., Rollin P. E., Peters C. J. Pathogenesis of a North American hantavirus, Black Creek Canal, in experimentally infected Sigmodon Hispidus // Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1998. Vol. 59. P. 58-65.
11. Lee H.W. Emergence and control of hantavirus diseases // Хантавирусы и хантавирусные инфекции. Владивосток, 2003. С. 20-55.
12. Meyer B., Schmaljohn C.S. Persistent hantavirus infections: characteristics and mechanisms // Trends in microbiol. 2000. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 61-67.
13. Safronetz D., Lindsay R., Hjelle B. et al. Use of Ig G avidity to indirectly monitor epizootic transmission of Sin Nombre virus in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) // Amer. J. Trop. Med., Hyg. 2006. Vol. 75, issue 6. P. 1135-1139.
14. Vapalahti O., Mustonen J., Lundkvist A. et al. Hantavirus infections in Europe // Lancet. Infect. Dis. 2003. Vol. 3, No. 10. P. 653-661.
15. Zhang Y.Z., Xiao D.L., Wang Y. et al. The epidemic characteristics and preventive measures of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in China // Chin. J. Epidemiol. 2004. Vol. 25, No. 6. P. 466-469.
Review
For citations:
, , , , , , Slonova R.A., Kushnareva T.V., Kompanets G.G., Maksema I.G., Iunikhina O.V., Kushnarev E.L. Epidemiology of Hantavirus and epizootic process in Apodemus genus mice populations. Pacific Medical Journal. 2010;(3):34-37. (In Russ.)
Views:
221
Email this article 