Alphabet of renal surgery: ABC score
https://doi.org/10.17238/PmJ1609-1175.2017.2.68-69
Abstract
Retried the experience of the study conducted at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (USA) and devoted to the validation of ABC systems - a new classification of kidney tumors, based on relations between neoplasms and vascular system of the organ. In order to improve the vessels imaging, 39 patients underwent a contrast-enhanced computed tomography according to a special protocol before laparoscopic resection of the kidney. Statistical analysis revealed a strong connection between the stage of neoplasm according to the new classification, the time of ischemia and the volume of intraoperative blood loss. Thus, the ABC scale has shown significant opportunities in predicting the complexity of surgical intervention.
About the Authors
I. V. Semenyakin
City Clinical Hospital No. 50
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. Yu. Pushkar
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. A. Malhasyan
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. A. Prokopovich
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Benadiba S., Verin A.L., Pignot G. [et al.]. Are urologists and radiologists equally effective in determining the renal nephrometry score? // Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2015. Vol. 22. P. 1618-1624.
2. Canter D., Kutikov A., Manley B. [et al.]. Utility of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decisionmaking of the enhancing renal mass // Urology. 2011. Vol. 78. P. 1089-1094.
3. Ficarra V., Novara G., Secco S. [et al.]. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephronsparing surgery // Eur. Urol. 2009. Vol. 56. P. 786-793.
4. Hakky T.S., Baumgarten A.S., Allen B. [et al.]. Zonal nephro scoring system: a superior renal tumor complexity classification model // Clin. Genitourin. Cancer. 2014. Vol. 12. P. e13-e18.
5. Kopp R.P., Mehrazin R., Palazzi K.L. [et al.]. Survival outcomes after radical and partial nephrectomy for clinical T2 renal tumors categorized by renal nephrometry score // BJU Int. 2013. Vol. 114. P. 708-718.
6. Kutikov A., Uzzo R.G. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth // J. Urol. 2009. Vol. 182. P. 844-853.
7. Lavallee L.T., Desantis D., Kamal F. [et al.]. The association between renal tumour scoring systems and ischemia time during open partial nephrectomy // Can. Urol. Assoc. J. 2012. Vol. 15. P. 1-8.
8. Reddy U.D., Pillai R., Parker R.A. [et al.]. Prediction of complications after partial nephrectomy by renal nephrometry score // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2014. Vol. 96. P. 475-479.
9. Simhan J., Smaldone M.C., Tsai K.J. [et al.]. Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy // Eur. Urol. 2011. Vol. 60. P. 724-730.
10. Simmons M.N., Ching C.B., Samplaski M.K. [et al.]. Kidney tumor location measurement using the C Index method // J. Urol. 2010. Vol. 183. P. 1708-1713.
11. Simmons M.N., Hillyer S.P., Lee B.H. [et al.]. Diameter-axial-polar nephrometry: integration and optimization of R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index scoring systems // J. Urol. 2012. Vol. 188. P. 384-390.
12. Spaliviero M., Poon B., Aras O. [et al.]. An Arterial Based Complexity (ABC) scoring system to assess the morbidity profile ofpartial nephrectomy // Eur. Urol. 2016. Vol. 69, No. 1. P. 72-79.
13. Tobert C.M., Kahnoski R.J., Thompson D.E. [et al.]. Renal nephrometry score predicts surgery type independent of individual surgeon’s use of nephron-sparing surgery // Urology. 2012. Vol. 80. P. 157-161.
Review
For citations:
Semenyakin I.V., Pushkar D.Yu., Malhasyan V.A., Prokopovich M.A. Alphabet of renal surgery: ABC score. Pacific Medical Journal. 2017;(2):68-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/PmJ1609-1175.2017.2.68-69
Views:
378
Email this article 