Preview

Pacific Medical Journal

Advanced search

Functional implantation outcomes of different intraocular lens in cataract patients with a history of penetrating keratoplasty

https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2025-3-73-76

Abstract

Objective. A comparative analysis of the functional outcomes of toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with the mechanism of wavefront formation during surgical correction of aphakia in patients after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). Materials and methods. The prospective study included 65 eyes (65 patients) with a history of PKP who underwent cataract surgery. In group 1 (34 patients, 34 eyes), monofocal thoric IOL AcrySof IQ Toric was implanted. In group 2, toric IOL with wave front formation mechanism AcrySof IQ Vivity (31 patients, 31 eyes) was implemented. Results. In group 2, during the follow-up period of up to 6 months, the mean error of the spherical equivalent refraction (SE) from the expected result was 1.22 ± 0.875. In group 2, this value was significantly lower, 0.76 ± 0.582. No statistically significant difference was found between the mean values of the subjective cylindrical component in both study groups. Patients in group 2 also demonstrated a smoother defocus curve. Conclusion. Due to its design features, IOL with the mechanism of wavefront formation enables the achievement of a reliably smaller spherical equivalent refraction, a more accurate target refraction, and, accordingly, an optimal uncorrected visual acuity.

About the Authors

D. A. Khvan
Pacific State Medical University; Primorskii Center of Eye Microsurgery
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Khvan, Postgraduate Student, Department of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology; ophthalmologist 

2 Ostryakova ave., Vladivostok, 690002, Russia

100e Borisenko srt., Vladivostok, 690088, Russia



G. A. Fedyashev
Pacific State Medical University; Primorskii Center of Eye Microsurgery
Russian Federation

Vladivostok



M. P. Ruchkin
Pacific State Medical University; Primorskii Center of Eye Microsurgery
Russian Federation

Vladivostok



References

1. Uzman SO, Akkaya ZY, Duzova E, Singar E, Burcu A. Corneal pathology and cataract: combined surgery or sequential surgery? Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021;51(1):1–6. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.04382

2. Cung LX, Hang DT, Hiep NX, Quyet D, Thai TV, Nga VT, Bac ND, Nguyen DN. Evaluation of phacoemulsification cataract surgery outcomes after penetrating keratoplasty. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2019;7(24):4301–4305. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.379

3. Lockington D, Wang EF, Patel DV, Moore SP, McGhee CNJ. Effectiveness of cataract phacoemulsification with toric intraocular lenses in addressing astigmatism after keratoplasty. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2014;40(12):2044–2049. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.03.025

4. Gruenauer-Kloevekorn C, Kloevekorn-Norgall K, Duncker GI, Habermann A. Refractive error after triple and non-simultaneous procedures:is the application of a standard constant keratometry value in IOL power calculation advisable? Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 2006;84(5):679–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00705.x


Review

For citations:


Khvan D.A., Fedyashev G.A., Ruchkin M.P. Functional implantation outcomes of different intraocular lens in cataract patients with a history of penetrating keratoplasty. Pacific Medical Journal. 2025;(3):73-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2025-3-73-76

Views: 19


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1609-1175 (Print)