Preview

Pacific Medical Journal

Advanced search

Laparoscopic nephrectomy at left side - alternative access

Abstract

Background. It was suggested the way of laparoscopic transmesenterial nephrectomy at left side. Methods. It was carried out the analysis of treatment results of 59 patients, having been had the laparoscopic nephrectomy at left side, 30 of them were operated transmesentrially, and 29 of them - in standard way. Results. Intrasurgery complications were not registered at transmesenterial surgery (they were registered twice at the standard surgery). The duration were nearly the same in both groups: average - 115 and 110 minutes. The duration of hospital admission were the same - 6 days. Under transmesenterial interference from the beginning of surgery to clipping the renal artery runs an average of 15 minutes, whereas in the standard nephrectomy -40 minutes. Conclusions. In our opinion, in many cases transmesenterial way has obvious advantages over the standard one and may be considered as an alternative way.

About the Authors

A. D. Kochkin
Road clinical hospital at Gorkiy station JCS 'Russian
Russian Federation


A. G. Martov
57 Moscow City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


F. A. Sevryukov
Road clinical hospital at Gorkiy station JCS 'Russian
Russian Federation


E. A. Gallyamov
A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation


V. P. Sergeev
62 Moscow City Oncological Hospital
Russian Federation


A. B. Novikov
Multi-field Medical Center of Bank of Russia
Russian Federation


K. S. Presnov
Multi-field Medical Center of Bank of Russia
Russian Federation


D. V. Semenychev
Road clinical hospital at Gorkiy station JCS 'Russian
Russian Federation


A. V. Knutov
Road clinical hospital at Gorkiy station JCS 'Russian
Russian Federation


A. E. Sanzharov
40 City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


I. N. Orlov
St. Luca City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


I. V. Meschankin
Treatment and Rehabilitation Center of MOH Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. Клинические рекомендации Европейской ассоциации урологов / отв. ред. Т.В. Клюковкина, Н.В. Черножукова, А.Г. Шегай. М.: АБВ-пресс, 2010. 1031с.

2. Эндовидеохирургическое лечение больных с опухолями почек / С.В. Попов, А.И. Новиков, О.Н. Скрябин [и др.]. СПб.: СПбМАПО, 2011. 224 с.

3. Breda A., Finelli A., Janetschek G. [et al.] Complications of laparoscopic surgery for renal masses: prevention, management and comparison with the open experience // Eur. Urol. 2009. Vol. 55. P. 836-850.

4. Clayman R.V, Kavoussi L.R., Soper N.J. [et al.] Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report // J. Urol. 1991. Vol. 146. P. 278-282.

5. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery in urology. Atlas of standart procedures / J.-U. Stolzenburg, I.A. Turk, E.N. Liatsikos. Springer: Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York, 2011. 386 p.

6. Porpiglia F., Terrone C., Cracco C. [et al.] Direct access to the renal artery at the level of Treitz ligament during left radical laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy // Eur. Urol. 2005. Vol. 48. P. 291-295.

7. Robson C. Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma // J. Urol. 1963. Vol. 89. P 37-41.

8. Schwartz M.J., Faiena I., Cinman N. [et al.] Laparoscopic bowel injury in retroperitoneal surgery: current incidence and outcomes // J. Urol. 2010. Vol. 184. P 589-594.

9. Wang L., Yang Q., Sheng J. [et al.] Left laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in the presence of a duplicated inferior vena cava with complicated anomalous tributaries by a transmesocolic approach // J. Urol. 2012. Vol. 80. P e1-e2.


Review

For citations:


Kochkin A.D., Martov A.G., Sevryukov F.A., Gallyamov E.A., Sergeev V.P., Novikov A.B., Presnov K.S., Semenychev D.V., Knutov A.V., Sanzharov A.E., Orlov I.N., Meschankin I.V. Laparoscopic nephrectomy at left side - alternative access. Pacific Medical Journal. 2015;(4):66-68. (In Russ.)

Views: 285


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1609-1175 (Print)