The results of penetrating keratoplasty in endothelial corneal dystrophy using preserved donor material
Abstract
Medical University (2 Ostryakova Ave. Vladivostok 690950 Russian Federation) Background. Research objective is an assessment of surgical and functional results of penetrating keratoplasty in endothelial corneal dysfunction using preserved donor transplant. Methods. 15 patients (15 eyes) aged 55-83 with the secondary (postoperative) endothelial corneal dystrophy were got penetrating keratoplasty with the “Material for cornea recovery”, produced by eye bank “EyeLab” (Moscow). Results. In all cases there was complete recovery of transplant transparency during 1-3 months. The medium density of the endothelium was 1741±234 cells/mm2, the medium loss of the endothelium - 18±9 %. Normalization of corneal thickness has occurred in 2-3 months after surgery. Conclusions. The effectiveness of “Material for cornea recovery” for penetrating keratoplasty is not inferior to the efficacy of the native donor material.
About the Authors
A. V. Zolotorevskiy
Eye bank “EyeLab”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
G. A. Fedyashev
Primorsky center of eye microsurgery, Pacific State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Волков В.В., Дронов М.М. К разработке хирургического метода лечения эндотелиально-эпителиальной дистрофии роговицы // I съезд офтальмологов республик Закавказья. Сухуми, 1976. С. 150-165.
2. Дронов М.М. Руководство по кератопластике. СПб.: Влази-пресс, 1997. 178 с.
3. Независимый банк материалов для кератопластики [электронный ресурс]. URL: http:// http://eye-bank.ru/ (дата обращения: 18.04.2015).
4. Abou-Jaoude E.S., Brooks М., Katz D.G., Van Meter W.S. Spontaneous wound dehiscence after removal of single continuous penetrating keratoplasty suture // Ophthalmology 2002. Vol. 109. P. 1291-1296.
5. Al-Yousuf N., Mavrikakis I., Mavrikakis E., Daya S.M. Penetrating keratoplasty: indications over a 10 year period // British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2004. Vol. 88. P 998-1001.
6. Borderie V., Sandali O., Bullet J. [et al.] Long-term results of deep anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty // Ophthalmology. 2012. Vol. 119 (2). P. 249-255.
7. Bourne W.M. Clinical estimation of corneal endothelial pump function // Trans. American Ophthalmol. Soc. 1998. Vol. 96. P. 229-239.
8. Cosar C.B., Sridhar M.S., Cohen E. J. [et al.] Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and associated procedures, 1996-2000 // Cornea. 2002. Vol. 21. P. 148-151.
9. Culbertson W.W., Abbott R.L., Forster R.K. Endothelial cell loss in penetrating keratoplasty // Ophthalmology. 1982. Vol. 89. P. 600-604.
10. Dobbins K.R.B., Price F.W., Whitson W.E. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the Midwestern United States // Cornea. 2000. Vol. 19. P813-816.
11. Fasolo A., Capuzzo C., Fornea M. [et al.] Risk factors for graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty: 5-year follow-up from the corneal transplant epidemiological study// Cornea. 2011. Vol. 30. P. 1328-1335.
12. Krachmer J.H., Mannis M.J., Holland E.J. Cornea. Fundamentals, diagnosis and management: 2nd Edition. Elsevier-Mosby, 2005. Vol. 1. 1409 p.
13. Melles G.R., Eggink F., Lander F A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty // Cornea. 1998. Vol. 17. P. 618-626.
14. Narayanan R., Gaster R.N., Kenney M.C. Pseudophakie corneal edema: a review of mechanisms and treatments // Cornea. 2006. Vol. 25, No. 9. P 993-1004.
15. Waldock A., Cook S.D. Corneal transplantation: how successful are we? // British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2000. Vol. 84. P. 813-815.
Review
For citations:
Zolotorevskiy A.V., Fedyashev G.A. The results of penetrating keratoplasty in endothelial corneal dystrophy using preserved donor material. Pacific Medical Journal. 2015;(3):65-67. (In Russ.)
Views:
252
Email this article 