LATE RESULTS OF TRICUSPID VALVE REPAIR WITH BIOLOGICAL PROSTHESES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
Abstract
The paper provides results of surgical treatment of 158 adult patients operated in 1999-2011. The follow-up period lasted from 2 to 130 months. The actuarial survival rate reached 99±7 % by the end of the 1st year of the follow-up, 93±3 % - by the end of the 5th year of the follow-up, and 93±3 % - by the end of the 11th year of the follow-up. In 87 % of case follow-ups the surgery results were found to be good. In the general group, by the end of the 1st, 5th and 11th years of the follow-up, the rates of freedom from structural dysfunction were 99.5±0.5 %, 95±3 %, and 64±13 %, respectively. By the 11th year of the follow-up, this parameter came up to 100 % in patients aged 60 and older, 71 % - in patients aged 45-59, and 60 % - in patients younger than 50. The rates of freedom from non-structural dysfunction were 98.5±0.9 % by the end of the 1st year after surgery, 95±2.5 % - by the end of the 5th year after the surgery, and 91±5.8 % - by the end of the 11th year after surgery.
About the Authors
D. A. Astapov
Novosibirsk State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. M. Karaskov
Novosibirsk State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. V. Kim
Novosibirsk State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. I. Semenova
Novosibirsk State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. P. Demidov
Novosibirsk State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Астапов Д.А., Караськов А.М., Семенов И.И. и др. Протезирование митрального клапана биологическими протезами «КемКор» и «ПериКор»: отдаленные результаты // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2010. № 4. С. 23-28.
2. Бабенко С.И., Муратов Р.М., Хатем А.С. и др. Биопротезирование клапанов сердца у пациентов старше 65 лет // Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2009. № 1. С. 14-18.
3. Барбараш Л.С., Караськов А.М., Семеновский М.Л. и др. Биопротезы клапанов сердца в России: опыт трех клиник // Патол. кровообр. и кардиохирургия. 2011. № 2. С. 21-26.
4. Караськов А.М., Семенов И.И., Железчиков В.Е. и др. Способ хирургической коррекции комбинированных пороков митрального и аортального клапанов на фоне активного инфекционного эндокардита // Патент на изобретение. RUS 2355327. 04.12.2006.
5. Baxter R.H., Bain W.H., Rankin R.J. et al. Tricuspid valve replacement: a five-year replacement // Thorax. 1975. Vol. 30. P. 158-161.
6. Carrier M., Hebert Y., Pellerin M. et al. Tricuspid valve replacement: an analysis of 25 years of experience at a single center // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003. Vol. 75. P. 47-50.
7. Chang B.C., Lim S.H., Yi G. et al. Long-term clinical results of tricuspid valve replacement. // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2006. Vol. 81. P. 1317-1323.
8. Kaplan M., Cut M.S., Demirtas M.M. et al. Prosthetic replacement of tricuspid valve: bioprosthetic or mechanical // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002. Vol. 73. P. 467-473.
9. McCarthy P.M., Sales V.L. Evolving indications for tricuspid valve surgery // Curr. Treat. Options Cardiovasc. Med. 2010. Vol. 12. P. 587-597.
10. Yaminisharif A., Alamzadeh-Ansari M.J., Ahmadi S.H. et al. Prosthetic tricuspid valve thrombosis: three case reports and literature review // J. Tehran. Heart Cent. 2012. Vol. 7. P. 147-155.
Review
For citations:
Astapov D.A., Karaskov A.M., Kim M.V., Semenova E.I., Demidov D.P. LATE RESULTS OF TRICUSPID VALVE REPAIR WITH BIOLOGICAL PROSTHESES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. Pacific Medical Journal. 2013;(3):41-44. (In Russ.)
Views:
321
Email this article 