Preview

Тихоокеанский медицинский журнал

Расширенный поиск

Современные методы хирургического лечения пролапса гениталий у женщин с использованием синтетических сетчатых протезов

Аннотация

Обзор зарубежной литературы, посвященный сравнительному анализу способов лечения пролапса гениталий у женщин. Приводятся результаты рандомизированных многоцентровых исследований эффективности применения имплантатов систем Perigee, Apogee, Avaulta, Pinnacle and Uphold, Elevate и Prolift. Анализируются частота и структура ранних и поздних послеоперационных осложнений. Делается вывод, что традиционные методы хирургической коррекции пролапса гениталий и методы с использованием синтетических протезов и имплантатов, изготовленных из биоматериалов, демонстрируют сопоставимую эффективность.

Об авторах

В. В. Дьяков
Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет
Россия


В. А. Малхасян
Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет
Россия


Список литературы

1. Abdel-Fattah M. Ramsay I. West of Scotland Study Group. Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse // BJOG. 2008. Vol. 115, No. 1. P. 22-30.

2. Al-Nazer M.A. IWGI. Comparative study between anterior colporrhaphy versus vaginal wall repair with mesh for management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse // Int. Urogynecol. J. 2007. Vol. 18, Suppl. 1. P. S49-S50.

3. Aungst M.J., Friedman E.B., Von Pechmann W.S. et al. De novo stress incontinence and pelvic muscle symptoms after transvaginal mesh repair// Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009. Vol. 201, No. 1. P. 73-77.

4. Baessler K., Hewson A.D., Tunn R. et al. Severe mesh complications following intravaginal slingplasty // Obstet. Gynecol. 2005. Vol. 106, No. 4. P. 713-716.

5. Borstad E., Abdelnoor M., Staff A.C., Kulseng-Hanssen S. Surgical strategies for women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010. Vol. 21, No. 2. P. 179-186.

6. Carey M., Higgs P., Goh J. et al. Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial // BJOG. 2009. Vol. 116, No. 10. P. 1380-1386.

7. Cosson M., Caquant F., Collinet P. et al. Prolift mesh (Gynecare) for pelvic organ prolapse surgical treatment using the TVM group: a retrospective study of 687 patients. Communication in the ICS meeting Montreal 31 August 2005.

8. De Ridder D. Should we use meshes in the management of vaginal prolapse? // Curr. Opin. Urol. 2008. Vol. 18. P. 377-382.

9. Diez-Itza I., Aizpitarte I., Becerro A., Sarasqueta C. Incidence of overactive bladder after vaginal hysterectomy and associated repairs for pelvic organ prolapse // Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2009. Vol. 68, No. 1. P. 65-70.

10. Farnsworth B.N. Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) for severe posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse - a preliminary report on efficacy and safety // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002. Vol. 13, No. 1. P. 4-8.

11. Foon R., Toozs-Hobson P., Latthe P.M. Adjuvant materials in anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008. Vol. 19. P. 1697-1706.

12. Gandhi S., Goldberg R.P., Kwon C. et al. A prospective randomized trial using solvent dehydrated fascia lata for the prevention of recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005. Vol. 192. P. 1649-1654.

13. Gauruder-Burmester A., Koutouzidou P., Rohne J. et al. Follow-up after polypropylene mesh repair of anterior and posterior compartments in patients with recurrent prolapse // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007. Vol. 18, No. 9. P. 1059-1064.

14. Glazener C.M.A., Adams E.J. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. C. Maher, K. Baessler, S.H. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4, 2009 (Status in this issue: Unchanged) // BJOG. 2009. Vol. 116, No. 10. P. 1380-1386.

15. Hiltunen R., Nieminen K., Takala T. et al. Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial // Obstet. Gynecol. 2007. Vol. 110. P. 455-462.

16. Hviid U.H. A randomised controlled study of biomesh (Pelvicol) for vaginal anterior wall prolapse // Int. Urogynecol. J. 2005. Vol. 16. P. S58.

17. Julian T.M. The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of sever, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996. Vol. 175, No. 6. P. 1472-1475.

18. Lowman J.K., Jones L.A., Woodman P.J., Hale D.S. Does the Prolift system cause dyspareunia?// Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008. Vol. 199, No. 6. P. 707.

19. Luck A.M., Steele A.C., Leong F.C., McLennan M.T. Short-term efficacy and complications of posterior intravaginal slingplasty // Int. J. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008. Vol. 19, No. 6. P. 795-799.

20. Meschia M., Pifarotti P., Bernasconi F. et al. Porcine skin collagen implants to prevent anterior vaginal wall prolapse recurrence: a multicenter, randomized study // J. Urol. 2007. Vol. 177. P. 192-195.

21. Morley G.W., DeLancey J.O. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for eversion of the vagina // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1988. Vol. 158, No. 4. P. 872-881.

22. Natale F., La P.C., Padoa A. et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing Gynemesh, a synthetic mesh, and Pelvicol, a biologic graft, in the surgical treatment of recurrent cystocele // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009. Vol. 20. P. 75-81.

23. Nguyen J.N., Burchette R.J. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial // Obstet. Gynecol. 2008. Vol. 111, No. 4. P. 891-898.

24. Novara G., Galfano A., Mancini M. et al. Critical assessment of pelvic floor surgical reconstruction outcome // EAU-EBU Update Series. 2006. Vol. 4. P. 202-213.

25. Nygaard I. What does “FDA-approved” mean for medical devices? // Obstet. Gynecol. 2008. Vol. 111, No. 1. P. 4-6.

26. Paraiso M.F., Barber M.D., Muir T.W., Walters M.D. Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006. Vol. 195. P. 1762-1771.

27. Reisenauer C., Kirschniak A., Drews U., Wallwiener D. Anatomical conditions for pelvic floor reconstruction with polypropylene implant and its applicatior for the treatment of vaginal prolapse // Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2007. Vol. 131, No. 2. P. 214-225.

28. Sand P.K., Koduri S., Lobel R. W. et al. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles //Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001. Vol. 184, No. 7. P. 1357-1362.

29. Valentim-Lourenco A., Henriques A., Ribeirinho A.L. et al. Outcome (POP-Q) of pelvic organ prolapse with Prolift1 prosthesis vs collagen prosthesis (Pelvicol1) vs classical anterior and/or posterior colporaphy: prospective study // ICS meeting, Christchurch. 2006. Abstract 442.

30. Weber A.M., Walters M.D., Piedmonte M.R., Ballard L.A. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001. Vol. 185, No. 6. P. 1299-1304.


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Дьяков В.В., Малхасян В.А. Современные методы хирургического лечения пролапса гениталий у женщин с использованием синтетических сетчатых протезов. Тихоокеанский медицинский журнал. 2011;(1):14-19.

For citation:


Diakov V.V., Malkhasyan V.A. Modern methods of surgical treatment for female genital prolapse with synthetic mesh prosthesis. Pacific Medical Journal. 2011;(1):14-19. (In Russ.)

Просмотров: 224


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1609-1175 (Print)