Introduction of uniportal VATS access when performing lobectomies
https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2024-3-39-43
Abstract
Aim. Analysis of surgical indices during monoport thoracoscopic lobectomies in Sakhalin Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary at different stages of mastering the technique.
Materials and methods. Case histories of 251 patients who underwent radical surgical treatment for lung cancer using monoport thoracoscopic access. Patients were divided into two groups: initial (109 patients) and advanced (142 patients). The average surgical time, number of complications and conversions were assessed.
Results. Mastering the technique leads to a statistically significant reduction in surgical time. The difference in other parameters, such as the number of postoperative complications and the percentage of conversions at different stages, tends to decrease.
Conclusion. Surgical indices improve as the team goes through the learning curve. The technique is adequate and reproducible for surgical treatment of patients with lung cancer.
About the Authors
V. V. Kondratyev
Sakhalin Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary;
Pacific State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viktor V. Kondratyev, oncologist at the Department of thoracic oncology; assistant at the department of oncology
3 Gorkogo st., Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 693010, Sakhalin region, Russia
V. I. Apanasevich
Pacific State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladivostok
S. S. Startsev
Sakhalin Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary;
Pacific State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk
Vladivostok
E. B. Nedelkin
Sakhalin Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk
I. S. Usoltseva
Sakhalin Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary;
Pacific State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk
Vladivostok
References
1. Kaprin AD, Starinskiy VV, Shakhzadova AO. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2021 (morbidity and mortality). Moscow: Moscow Research Oncology Institute named after P.A. Herzen, 2022. 252 p. (In Russ.)
2. Gonzalez-Rivas D, Ng C, Rocco G, D’Amico TA. Atlas of uniportal video assisted thoracic surgery. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., 2019. 238 p. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-2604-2
3. Dziedzic D, Orlowski T. The role of VATS in lung cancer surgery: current status and prospects for development. Minim Invasive Surg. 2015;2015:938430. doi: 10.1155/2015/938430
4. Pischik VG. Technical difficulties and extending the indications for VATS lobectomy. J Thor Dis. 2014;6(6):623–30. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.10.11
5. Tristan DY, Cao C, D'Amico TA, Demmy TL, He J, Hansen H, Swanson SJ, Walker WS. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy at 20 years: a consensus statement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;45(4):633–9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt463
6. Gonzalez-Rivas D, Bosinceanu M, Motas N, Manolache V. Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery for lung resections. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;62(3):1–3. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac410
7. Shigemura N, Akashi A, Funaki S, Nakagiri T, Inoue M, Sawabata N, Shiono H, Minami M, Takeuchi Y, Okumura M, Sawa Y. Longterm outcomes after a variety of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy approaches for clinical stage IA lung cancer: A multiinstitutional study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;132(3):507–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.03.058
8. Rocco G. Single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (uniportal) in the routine general thoracic surgical practice. Gen Thorac Surg. 2009;14(4):326–35. doi: 10.1053/j.optechstcvs.2009.08.002
9. Gonzalez-Rivas D, Paradela M, Fieira E, Velasco C. Singleincision video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: initial results. J Thor Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(3):745–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.049
10. Dexter E, Attwood K, Demmy T, Yendamuri S. Does operative duration of lobectomy for early lung cancer increase perioperative morbidity? Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;114(3):941–7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.01.040
11. Petersen RH, Hansen HJ. Learning thoracoscopic lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37(3):516–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.09.012
12. Laven IEWG, Daemen JHT, Franssen AJPM, Gronenschild MHM, Hulsewé KWE, Vissers YLJ, de Loos ER. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lobectomy: the learning curve. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023;37(2):ivad135. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad135
13. Servais EL, Miller DL, Thibault D, Quadri SM, D’Agostino RS, Burfeind WR. Conversion to thoracotomy during thoracoscopic vs robotic lobectomy: predictors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;114(2):409–17. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.10.067
14. Amore D, Natale DD, Scaramuzzi R, Curcio C. Reasons for conversion during VATS lobectomy: what happens with increased experience. J Vis Surg. 2018;4(53):1–5. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2018.03.02
15. Decaluwe H, Sokolow Y, Deryck F, Stanzi A, Depypere L, Moons J, Raemdonck DV, Leyn PD. Thoracoscopic tunnel technique for anatomical lung resections: a «fissure first, hilum last» approach with staplers in the fissureless patient. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;21(1):2–7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv048
Review
For citations:
Kondratyev V.V., Apanasevich V.I., Startsev S.S., Nedelkin E.B., Usoltseva I.S. Introduction of uniportal VATS access when performing lobectomies. Pacific Medical Journal. 2024;(3):39-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2024-3-39-43
Views:
232
Email this article 