Focal form of tickborne encephalitis affected by acute cerebrovascular disorders
https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2025-1-90-93
Abstract
The relevance of the problem of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is explained by its vast geographical distribution and a wide variety of its clinical diseases, from inapparent (febrile) infections to severe meningoencephalitic forms leading to disability. In the Russian Far East, the infectious process of TBE with varying degrees of severity is caused by strains of the Far Eastern subtype only, which are variable in parameters of both biological and molecular-genetic characteristics and characterized by more severe and pronounced damage to the central nervous system. We present a unique case of polioencephalomyelitic TBE form, i.e., an initial progredient continuously progressive variant with the clinic of pronounced peripheral tetraparesis, paresis of shoulder girdle and diaphragm muscles, and lesions of cranial bulbar nerves (9, 10 and 12 pairs). The features of the clinic are explained by the patient's prolonged forced stay on artificial ventilation at the onset of acute cerebral circulatory failure.
About the Authors
P. P. KalinskiyRussian Federation
10 Ajax, Russian Island, Vladivostok, 690922, Primorsky Krai
A. F. Popov
Russian Federation
10 Ajax, Russian Island, Vladivostok, 690922, Primorsky Krai
D. P. Kalinskiy
Russian Federation
Vladivostok
V. A. Ivanis
Russian Federation
Vladivostok
M. I. Egorova
Russian Federation
Vladivostok
A. Y. Chernyakova
Russian Federation
Vladivostok
N. S. Tumanova
Russian Federation
Natalia S. Tumanova, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the School of Medicine and Life Sciences,
10 Ajax, Russian Island, Vladivostok, 690922, Primorsky Krai
References
1. Leonova GN, Krylova NV, Pavlenko EV, Belikov SI, Kondratiev IG. The importance of Far Eastern strains of tick-borne encephalitis virus in infectious pathology. Public Health and Life Environment. 2017;1:4–6 (In Russ.).
2. On the state of sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population in the Russian Federation in 2023: State report. Moscow: Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-being. 2024;364 p. (In Russ.).
3. Chagina EA, Turmova EP, Mikhaylenko AN, Khlebnikova MS. The incidence of tick-borne encephalitis in the Primorsky Territory in the period from 2005 to 2020. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2023; 10–1 (85):70–3 (In Russ.). doi:10.24412/2500-1000-2023-10-1-70-73
4. Volkova LI. Problematic aspects of the chronization of tick-borne viral encephalitis. Medicinskie Novosti. 2023;2(341):9–14 (In Russ.).
5. Kolyasnikova NM, Gerasimov SG, Ishmukhametov AA, Pogodina VV. Evolution of tick-borne encephalitis over an 80-year period: main manifestations, probable causes. Epidemiology and Vaccine Prevention. 2020; 19(3):78–88 (In Russ.). doi:10.31631/2073-3046-2020-19-3-78-88
6. Ierusalimskij A.P. Progredient forms of tickborne encephalitis. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Medical University. Univ., 2011. 76 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kalinskiy P.P., Popov A.F., Kalinskiy D.P., Ivanis V.A., Egorova M.I., Chernyakova A.Y., Tumanova N.S. Focal form of tickborne encephalitis affected by acute cerebrovascular disorders. Pacific Medical Journal. 2025;(1):90-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2025-1-90-93