Implementation of clinical guidelines for the treatment of patients with proximal femoral fractures at Vladivostok City Hospital No. 2
https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2025-2-92-97
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of implementing the algorithm from the Federal Clinical Guidelines "Proximal Femoral Fractures" into the practice of the trauma service at Vladivostok Clinical Hospital No. 2. Materials and methods. With the implementation of the clinical guidelines at Vladivostok Clinical Hospital No. 2, a local protocol for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with proximal femoral fractures was developed. During the period from 2023 to 2024, 1,345 patients with proximal femoral fractures were treated at the hospital, which accounts for 12.9% of all hospitalized patients. The entire patient cohort was classified according to ICD-10 into the following subgroups: fracture of the femoral neck (S72.0), pertrochanteric (intertrochanteric) fracture (S72.1), and subtrochanteric fracture (S72.2). Results. By the end of 2024, the overall proportion of operated patients increased to 94.5%. Mortality in the operated group decreased from 2.45% in 2023 to 2.2% in 2024. In-hospital mortality among nonoperated patients reached 17.9%. The proportion of patients who underwent surgery within the first 48 hours increased from 32.2% at the end of 2023 to 64.2% by the end of 2024. Conclusion. The implementation of clinical guidelines for the treatment of patients with proximal femoral fractures, as presented in this study and carried out at Vladivostok Clinical Hospital No. 2, highlights the identified challenges and provides a framework that can be applied in other hospital settings
About the Authors
R. E. KostivRussian Federation
Roman E. Kostiv, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the 2nd Traumatology Department; Professor
of the Institute of Surgery
57 Russkaya Str., Vladivostok, 690105
E. P. Kostiv
Russian Federation
K. E. Shved
Russian Federation
E. G. Monastyrskaya
Russian Federation
E. E. Kostiva
Russian Federation
N. A. Vereshchak
Russian Federation
A. P. Prodan
Russian Federation
References
1. Solod EI, Lazarev AF, Zagorodny NV, Kostiv EP, Furtyk AB, Dendymarchenko RS, Kostiv RE. The surgical treatment of patients with medial fractures of the femoral neck. Pacific Medical Journal. 2018;1:19–25 (In Russ). doi: 10.17238/PmJ1609-1175.2018.1.19–25
2. Muhm M, Amann M, Hofmann A, Ruffing T. Veränderung der Patientenklientel mit hüftgelenknahen Femurfrakturen in der letzten Dekade: Inzidenz, Alter, Nebenerkrankungen und Liegezeiten Changes in the patient population with proximal femur fractures over the last decade: Incidence, age, comorbidities, and length of stay Unfallchirurg. 2018;121(8):649–656 (In German) doi: 10.1007/s00113-017-0425-z
3. Belov MV, Belova KYu, Degtyarev AA, Ershova OB. Experience of medical care which is provided to patients of older age groups with a hip fracture in Yaroslavl region. Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine. 2020;(2):154–158 (In Russ.) doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-2-2020-154-158
4. Lesnyak OM, Baranova IA, Belova Kyu, Gladkova EN, Evstigneeva LP, Ershova OB, Karonova TL, Kochish AYu, Nikitinskaya OA, Skripnikova IA, Toroptsova NV, Aramisova RM. Osteoporosis in Russian Federation: epidemiology, socio-medical and economical aspects (review). Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2018;24(1):155–168 (In Russ.) doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-1-155-168
5. Tkacheva ON, Kotovskaya YuV, Rozanov AV, Babenko IV, Svishcheva SP, Abroskina OV. A set of measures aimed at preventing falls and fractures in elderly and senile people. Methodological recommendations. Moscow. 2021, 60 p. (In Russ.)
6. Клинические рекомендации «Переломы проксимального отдела бедренной кости», 2021. Clinical guidelines. Proximal femur fractures, 2021 (In Russ.) https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/729_1 (In Russ.)
7. Order of the Ministry of Health of Primorsky Krai dated June 29, 2021 No. 18/pr/817 “On the organization of the provision of medical care for fractures of the proximal femur to the adult population of Primorsky Krai (with amendments and additions)” (In Russ.)
8. Belov MV, Belova KYu. Сontemporary view of medical care of the elderly people with proximal femur fractures. Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine. 2021;2(6):176–185 (In Russ.) doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-2-2021-176-185
9. Rodionova SS, Seropolov PS, Torgashin AN. Effects of predictors of mortality at the stage of providing trauma care for fractures of the proximal femur in people 50 years of age and older. Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases. 2024;27(2):4–14 (In Russ.) doi: 10.14341/osteo13154
10. Shubnyakov II, Vorontsova TN, Bogopolskaya AS, Veber EV, Aliev AG, Tikhilov RM. Mortality in patients with proximal femur fractures undergoing conservative and surgical treatment. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2022;(4):60–68 (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202204160
11. Loggers SAI, Van Lieshout EMM, Joosse P, Verhofstad MHJ, Willems HC. Prognosis of nonoperative treatment in elderly patients with a hip fracture: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Injury. 2020 Nov;51(11):2407–2413. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.027
12. Lesnyak OM, Kochish AYu, Belenkiy IG, Belov MV, Belova KYu, Bozhkova SA, Buylova TV, Zagorodniy NV, Marchenkova LA, Pichugina GA, Rodionova SS, Runihina NK, Safonova YuA, Turusheva AV. Interdisciplinary consensus on the care of elderly patients with hip fractures based on an orthogeriatric approach. Medicinskij Al'yans, 2025;13(1):31–55 (In Russ.) doi: 10.36422/23076348-2025-13-1-31-55
Review
For citations:
Kostiv R.E., Kostiv E.P., Shved K.E., Monastyrskaya E.G., Kostiva E.E., Vereshchak N.A., Prodan A.P. Implementation of clinical guidelines for the treatment of patients with proximal femoral fractures at Vladivostok City Hospital No. 2. Pacific Medical Journal. 2025;(2):92-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2025-2-92-97